Preview

Journal of Arrhythmology

Advanced search

Long-term prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction receiving cardiac contractility modulation therapy: the impact of comorbidity burden on outcomes

https://doi.org/10.35336/VA-2023-1-06

Abstract

AimTo investigate the association between comorbidity burden and long-term clinical outcomes of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) undergoing cardiac contractility modulation (CCM).

MethodsOur study included 59 patients with HFrEF, functional class II/III (NYHA), sinus rhythm, who underwent implantation of CCM system between September 2015 and December 2018 and were further followed by a multidisciplinary team. A mean follow-up period was 1916±102 days. All-cause mortality and heart transplantation were considered as primary composite endpoint. The secondary composite endpoint included all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, im- plantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia and hospitalizations due to decompensated HF. Predicted survival rate were calculated using MAGGIC Risk Calculator and Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM). Initially, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was calculated for all patients.

Results. Three- and five-year survival rates were 79,7% and 66,1%, respectively, which were significantly higher than predicted by MAGGIC (p=0.02) and SHFM (p=0.01). The median time to the primary endpoint was 1494 days and the annual mortality was 7%. Patients with HF NYHA class III, chronic kidney disease and CCI ≥7 points had worse prognosis (p1=0.002, p2=0.003, p3=0.04 (log-rank test). There was a significant decrease in number of hospitalized pa- tients due to HF decompensated during CCM (p˂0.001) compared with the six-month period before the system implantation. Patients with CCI value ≥ 7 points reached secondary composite endpoint faster (p=0.002 and p=0.004 for three-year and five-year follow-up periods, respectively (log-rank test)).

ConclusionLong-term survival rates of patients with HFrEF II/III (NYHA) receiving CCM and managed on multidisciplinary team were significantly higher than predicted. The heavy comorbidity burden negatively impacts on the clinical course and outcomes of HF patients following CСM implantation. Applying the Charlson index can be useful in a comprehensive assessment of the prognosis and determining the target population for the expensive implantable devices, including CCM, in risk stratification and decision-making algorithms.

About the Authors

A. V. Pavlovskaya
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova str.


M. Yu. Sitnikova
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova str.


M. A. Trukshina
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova str.


V. L. Galenko
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova str.


T. A. Lelyavina
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova str.


M. A. Vander
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova str.


E. N. Mikhaylov
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova str.


D. S. Lebedev
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova str.


E. A. Lyasnikova
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova str.


References

1. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022; 3;145(18): e895-e1032. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063.

2. Belyalov F.I. Medical scores in clinical practice. Part III. Heart Failure. Clinical Medicine. 2017;95(1): 72-7. (In Russ). http://doi.org/10.18821/00232149-2017-95-1-72-77.

3. Amin MM, Witt CM, Waks JW, et al. Association between the Charlson comorbidity index and outcomes after implantable cardioverter defibrillator generator replacement. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(9): 1236-1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13762.

4. Theuns DA, Schaer BA, Soliman OI, et al. The prognosis of implantable defibrillator patients treated cardiac resynchronization therapy: Comorbidity burden as predictor of mortality. Europace. 2011;13(1): 62-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq328.

5. Ioannou A, Papageorgiou N, Barber H, et al. Impact of an Age-Adjusted Co-morbidity Index on Survival of Patients With Heart Failure Implanted With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(7): 1158-1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.056.

6. Boriani G, Berti E, Belotti LM, et al. RERAI (Registry of Emilia Romagna on Arrhythmia Interventions) Investigators. Cardiac device therapy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure: ‘real-world’ data on long-term outcomes (mortality, hospitalizations, days alive and out of hospital). Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(6): 693702. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.509.

7. Theuns DAMJ, Schaer BA, Caliskan K, Hoeks SE, Sticherling C, Yap SC, Alba AC. Application of the heart failure meta-score to predict prognosis in patients with cardiac resynchronization defibrillators. Int J Cardiol. 2021;330: 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.011.

8. Ruwald AC, Vinther M, Gislason GH, et al. The impact of co-morbidity burden on appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy and all-cause mortality: insight from Danish nationwide clinical registers. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(3): 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.685.

9. Steinberg BA, Al-Khatib SM, Edwards R, et al. Outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use in patients with comorbidities: results from a combined analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2(6): 623-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2014.06.007.

10. Schau T, Seifert M, Meyhöfer J, et al. Long-term outcome of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Europace. 2011;13(10): 1436-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eur153.

11. Kuschyk J, Roeger S, Schneider R, et al. Efficacy and survival in patients with cardiac contractility modulation: long-term single center experience in 81 patients. Int J Cardiol. 2015;183: 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.178.

12. Kloppe A, Lawo T, Mijic D et al. Long-term survival with Cardiac Contractility Modulation in patients with NYHA II or III symptoms and normal QRS duration. Int J Cardiol. 2016;209: 291-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.001.

13. Anker SD, Borggrefe M, Neuser H, et al. Cardiac contractility modulation improves long-term survival and hospitalizations in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(9): 1103-1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1374.

14. Kuschyk J, Falk P, Demming T, Marx O, et al. Longterm clinical experience with cardiac contractility modulation therapy delivered by the Optimizer Smart system. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23(7): 1160-1169. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2202.

15. Vander MA, Lyasnikova EA, Belyakova LA, et al. Dynamics of heart failure markers and cardiac reverse remodeling in patients receiving cardiac contractility modulation therapy. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(1): 4035. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-40712021-4035.

16. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5): 373-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/00219681(87)90171-8.

17. Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, et al. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation. 2006;113: 1424-1433. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584102.

18. Pocock SJ, Ariti CA, McMurray JJ, et al. Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure. Predicting survival in heart failure: a risk score based on 39 372 patients from 30 studies. Eur Heart J. 2013;34: 1404-1413. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs337.

19. Liu M, Fang F, Luo X, et al. Improvement of longterm survival by cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure patients: A case-control study. Int J Cardiol. 2016;206: 122-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.071.

20. Sitnikova MYu, Lyasnikova EA, Yurchenko AV, et al. Results of 3 years work of the Russian hospital register of chronic heart failure (RUssian hoSpital Heart Failure RRegistry —RUSHFR): relationship between management and outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. Kardiologiia. 2018;58(S10): 9-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2483.

21. Lyasnikova EA, Fedotov PA, Trukshina MA, et al. Management of heart failure patients in Russia: perspectives and realities of the second decade of the XXI century. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(9): 4658. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4658.

22. Chamberlain AM, St Sauver JL, Gerber Y, et al. Multimorbidity in heart failure: a community perspective. Am J Med. 2015;128(1): 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.08.024.

23. Dunlay SM, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Epidemiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14(10): 591-602. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.65.


Review

For citations:


Pavlovskaya A.V., Sitnikova M.Yu., Trukshina M.A., Galenko V.L., Lelyavina T.A., Vander M.A., Mikhaylov E.N., Lebedev D.S., Lyasnikova E.A. Long-term prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction receiving cardiac contractility modulation therapy: the impact of comorbidity burden on outcomes. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2023;30(1):42-51. https://doi.org/10.35336/VA-2023-1-06

Views: 349


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1561-8641 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7327 (Online)