CARDIAC PACEMAKER PROGRAMMING IN A PATIENT WITH ALTERED INTRA VENTRICULAR CONDUCTION AND PERSISTENT LEFT SUPERIOR VENA CAVA
Abstract
A case report is given of an altered inter-ventricular conduction at the site of the electrode implantation as well as corresponding peculiar features ofprogramming of a dual chamber pacemaker in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava are presented.
About the Authors
E. V. Lyan
Северо-западный центр диагностики и лечения аритмий при СПбГМА им. И.И.Мечникова
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. M. Yashin
Северо-западный центр диагностики и лечения аритмий при СПбГМА им. И.И.Мечникова
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. M. Los
Компания Медтроник
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. S. Klyukvin
Северо-западный центр диагностики и лечения аритмий при СПбГМА им. И.И.Мечникова
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. E. Rivin
Северо-западный центр диагностики и лечения аритмий при СПбГМА им. И.И.Мечникова
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Savelyev
Северо-западный центр диагностики и лечения аритмий при СПбГМА им. И.И.Мечникова
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Bramanti O, Melluso C, Luca F et al. Late Sensing Due to Extremely Delayed Right Ventricular Activation in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy // PACE.- 2009.-V. 32.- p. 677-679.
2. Vera Z, Mason DT, Awan NA, Hiliard G, Massumi RA. Lack of sensing by demand pacemakers due to intraventricular conduction defects // Circulation.- 1975.- V.51(5).-p.815-22.
3. Mantini E, Claude M, Gordon CM et al. Congenital anomalies involving the coronary sinus // Circulation. -1966.- V. 33.- p.317-327.
4. Amjad Hussein S, Chakravarty S, Chaikhouni A, Smith JR. Congenital absence of superior vena cava: unusual anomaly of superior systemic vein complicating pacemaker placement // PACE.- 1981.- V.4.-p.328-32.
5. Biffi M, Boriani G, Frabetti L et al. Left Superior Vena Cava Persistence in Patients Undergoing Pacemaker or Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation // Chest.- 2001.-V.120.- p.139-144.
6. Gillis AM, Purerfellner H, Israel CW, Sunthorn H, Kacet S, Anelli-Monti M, Tang F, Young M, Boriani G; Medtronic Enrhythm Clinical Study Investigators. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block // Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.- 2006.-V.29(7).- p.697-705.
7. Silverman L.F., Mankin H.T., McGoon D.C. Surgical treatment of an inadequate sinus mechanism by implantation of a right atrial pacemaker electrode // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg -1968.-V. 55.- p. 264-270.
8. Andersen H.R., Thuesen L., Bagger J.P. et al. Prospective randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick sinus syndrome // Lancet - 1994.-V. 344.-P.1523-1528.
9. Andersen H.R., Nielsen J.C., Rhomsen P.E.B. et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome // Lancet - 1997.-V.350.-1210 -1216.
10. Nielsen J.C., Kristensen L., Andersen H.R. et al. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome // J Am Coll Cardiol - 2003.-V. 42.-P.614-623.
11. The DAVID Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial // JAMA -2002.- V. 288.-P. 3115-3123.
12. Vassalo J.A., Cassidy D.M., Miller J.M. et al. Left ventricular endocardial activation during right ventricular pacing: effect of underlying heart disease // J Am Coll Cardiol. - 1986.-V.7.-P. 1228-1233.
13. Andersen H.R., Nielsen J.C., Thomsen P.E.B. et al. Atrioventricular conduction during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome // Circulation -1998.-V.98.- P.1315-1321.
14. Kristensen L., Nielsen J.C., Pedersen A.K. et al. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 339 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with AAI/AAIR pacemaker // Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. - 2001.-V. 24.-P.358-365.
15. Sweeney M.O., Hellkamp A.S., Ellenbogen K.A. et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction // Circulation - 2003.-V. 23.-P.2932-2937.
16. Nielsen J.C., Pedersen A.K., Mortensen P.T., Andersen H.R. Programming a fixed long atrio-ventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome // Europace -1999.-V.1.-P.113-120.
17. Sweeney M.O., Shea J.B., Hellkamp A.S. Effectiveness of DDI/R mode to minimize ventricular pacing in patients with dual chamber ICDs // Heart Rhythm - 2004.-1(suppl).-S42.
18. Deering T.F., Wilensky M., Tondato F. et al. Auto intrinsic conduction search algorithm: a prospective analysis // Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. - 2003.-V.26.-P.1080.
19. Sweeney M.O., Shea J.B., Fox V. et al. Randomized pilot study of a new atrial-based minimal ventricular pacing mode in dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators // Heart Rhythm.- 2004.- V.7.-P. 160.
Review
For citations:
Lyan E.V., Yashin S.M., Los M.M., Klyukvin A.S., Rivin A.E., Savelyev A.A. CARDIAC PACEMAKER PROGRAMMING IN A PATIENT WITH ALTERED INTRA VENTRICULAR CONDUCTION AND PERSISTENT LEFT SUPERIOR VENA CAVA. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2010;61(61):75-79. (In Russ.)
Views:
251
Email this article 