Preview

Journal of Arrhythmology

Advanced search

ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERMANENT PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION

Abstract

To develop the ultrasound-guided technique of endocardial electrode implantation and to compare it with traditional fluoroscopy-guided technique, 60 patients aged 61.4±21.4 years with clinically significant bradycardia were assessed and treated. The patients were distributed into two following groups: the ultrasound-guided procedure was performed in 30 patients of Group I; the commonly accepted fluoroscopy-guided procedure of endocardial electrode implantation was carried out in 30 patients of Group II. Electrodes with passive and active fixation were implanted through a standard surgical access; the electrode location in veins was controlled by ultrasound, if needed. When introducing ventricular electrodes, apical (four chamber view) or subcostal ultrasound access were the most commonly used ones. The ventricular electrode was placed in the apex or basal parts of interventricular septum (IVS); tests were made to confirm stability of the electrode location. For visualization of the ventricular electrode location in the right ventricular apex, modified apical views were most commonly used. The final electrode position was controlled by several echocardiographic views. Transesophageal echocardiography was used in complicated cases of unacceptable visualization. The atrial electrode was located in the right atrium appendage. When introducing the atrial electrode, the apical views (both two-chamber and four-chamber ones) during transthoracic echocardiography were the most commonly used. The fluoroscopy time in the study group was 76.26±4.14 s and in the control group, 204.35±6.06 s. For the last 5 procedures, its duration in both the study and control group became equal; the fluoroscopy time in the study group shrank to 5 s (control fluoroscopy). In 6 cases, tricuspid regurgitation (up to 9 cm2) along the ventricular electrode was revealed during the procedure, which caused the electrode relocation. Thus, the ultrasound-guided implantation of endocardial electrodes can significantly reduce the fluoroscopy time, optimize the intracardiac electrode location, and to find the most optimal location for implantation of a ventricular electrode into IVS.

About the Authors

A. N. Bogachevsky
ФГБУ «Федеральный центр сердечно-сосудистой хирургии»
Russian Federation


S. A. Bogachevskaya
ФГБУ «Федеральный центр сердечно-сосудистой хирургии»
Russian Federation


V. Yu. Bondar
ГБОУ ВПО «Дальневосточный государственный медицинский университет», Хабаровск
Russian Federation


References

1. Agarwal S., Tuzcu E., Rodriguez E., et al. Interventional cardiology perspective of functional tricuspid regurgitation // Cardiovascular Intervention.-2009. - Vol. 2 - P. 565-573.

2. Celiker C., Kucukoglu M.S., Arat-Ozkan A., et al. Right ventricularand tricuspid valve function in patients with two ventricular pacemaker leads // Japan Heart Journal. - 2004. - Vol. 45 - P. 103-108.

3. Champagne J., Poirier P., Dumesnil J.G., et al. Permanent pacemakerlead entrapment: role of the transaesophageal echocardiography // Pacing Clinical Electrophysiology. - 2002. - Vol. 25 - P. 1131-1134.

4. De Cock C.C., Vinkers M., Van Campe L.C., et al. Longterm outcome of patients with multiple noninfected transvenous leads: a clinical and echocardiographic study // Pacing Clin. Electrophysiology. - 2000. - Vol. 23 - P. 423-426.

5. Gibson T.C., Davidson R.C., De Silvey D.L. Presumptive tricuspid valve malfunction induced by a pacemaker lead: a case report andreview of the literature // Pacing Clin. Electrophysiology. - 1980. - Vol. 3 - P. 88-95.

6. Huang T.Y., Baba N. Cardiac pathology of transvenous pacemakers // American Heart Journal. - 1972. - Vol. 83 -P. 469-474.

7. Iskandar S.B., Ann Jackson S., Fahrig S., et al. Tricuspid valve malfunction and ventricular pacemaker lead: case report andreview of the literature // Echocardiography. - 2006. - Vol. 23 - P. 692-697.

8. Klutstein M., Balkin J., Butnaru A., et al. Tricuspid incompetence following permanent pacemaker implantation // Pacing Clin. Electrophysiology. - 2009. - Vol. 32 - P. 135-137.

9. Krupa W., Kozlowski D., Derejko P., et al. Permanent cardiac pacing and its influence on tricuspid valve function // Folia Morphologica(Warszawa). - 2001. - Vol. 60 - P. 249-257.

10. Lin G., Nishimura R.A., Connolly H.M., et al. Severe symptomatic tricuspid valve regurgitation due to permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads // Journal of American CollegeCardiology. - 2005. -Vol. 45 - P. 1672-1675.

11. Mordehay V., Jairo K., Yaron S., et al. Right ventricular pacing increases tricuspid regurgitation grade regardless of the mechanical interference to the valve by the electrode // European Journal of Echocardiography. - 2009 - Vol.11 - P. 550-553.

12. Morgan D.E., Norman R., West R.O., et al. Echocardiographic assessment of tricuspid regurgitation during ventricular demand pacing // American Journal of Cardiology. - 1986. - Vol. 58 - P. 1025-1029.

13. Novak M., Dvorak P., Kamaryt P., et al. Autopsy and clinical context in deceased patients with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators: intracardiac findings near their leads and electrodes // Europace. - 2009. - Vol. 11 - P. 1510-1516.

14. Nucifora G., Badano L.P., Allocca G., et al. Severe tricuspid regurgitation due to entrapment of the anterior leaflet ofthe valve by a permanent pacemaker lead: role of real timethree-dimensional echocardiography // Echocardiography. - 2007. - Vol. 24 - P. 649-652.

15. Postaci N., Eksi K., Bayata S., et al. Effect of the number of ventricular leads on right ventricular hemodynamics in patients with permanent pacemaker // Angiology. - 1995. - Vol. 46 - P. 421-424.

16. Rasha Al-Bawardy M.D. et al. Tricuspid regurgitation in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators: A comprehensive review // Clinical Cardiology. - 2013. - Vol. 36 - P. 249-254.

17. Rogers J., Bolling S. Current perspective and evolving management of tricuspid regurgitation // Circulation. - 2009. - Vol. 119 - P. 2718-2725.

18. Sakai M., Okhawa S., Ueda K., et al. Tricuspid regurgitation inducted by transvenous right ventricular pacing: Echocardiographic and pathological observations // Journal of Cardiology. - 1987. - Vol. 17 - P. 311-320.

19. Seo Y., Ishizu T., Nakajima H., et al. Clinical utility of 3-dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation caused by pacemaker leads // Circulation. - 2008. - Vol. 72 - P. 1465-1470.

20. Sweeney M.O., Hellkamp A.S. Heart Failure during сardiac pacing // Circulation. - 2006. - Vol. 23 - P. 2082-2088.

21. Weber K.T., Janicki J.S., Campbell C.H., et al. Pathophysiology of acute and chronic cardiac failure // American Journal of Cardiology. -1987. - Vol. 5 - P. 3-9.


Review

For citations:


Bogachevsky A.N., Bogachevskaya S.A., Bondar V.Yu. ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERMANENT PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2014;(78):42-46. (In Russ.)

Views: 175


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1561-8641 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7327 (Online)