Assessment of the frequency and possible risk factors for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the early postoperative period after transapical implantation of the MedLab-CT valve
https://doi.org/10.35336/VA-2020-4-5-11
Abstract
Aim. To study the incidence and possible risk factors for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the early postoperative period after transapical implantation of the first domestic aortic valve (TAVI) “MedLab-CT”.
Material and methods. The study included 118 patients after successful TAVI. The study did not include patients with open aortic valve replacement due to dislocation of the prosthesis, with severe intraoperative complications leading to the death of the patient, and patients with permanent AF. The mean age of the patients was 71.1 ± 4.9 years, body mass index was 31.1 ± 5.9 kg/m2, men were 39.8%, hypertension was in 93.2%, diabetes mellitus (DM) was in 27.9%, paroxysmal AF was in 12.7%, coronary heart disease (CHD) was in 56.7%, smoking was noted in 8.4% cases. The median follow-up time corresponded to the hospital stay - 9.5 days. To identify cardiac arrhythmias, daily regular ECG recordings in 12 leads were assessed from the first day after TAVI. In the presence of palpitations, 24-hour ECG monitoring was performed. Indicators such as age, male gender, DM, history of AF, interatrial block before surgery, CHD, and echocardiographic parameters were studied as possible predictors of AF development in the early postoperative period after TAVI. There were no significant differences in the studied parameters in patients with AF paroxysms and sinus rhythm.
Results. In the early postoperative period, AF episodess occurred in 46 (39%) patients. New-onset AF occurred in 38 (32.2%) patients. The only statistically significant risk factor for AF in the postoperative period in our series of observations was CHD (OR 5.756; 95% CI 1.009-8.132; p = 0.048).
Conclusion. Patients with paroxysmal AF in the early postoperative period were not detected cerebrovascular events. In the early postoperative period, the only significant predictor of AF was the presence of proven CHD in patients.
About the Authors
O. V. PopylkovaRussian Federation
Popylkova Oxana
Penza
S. S. Durmanov
Russian Federation
Penza
A. B. Voevodin
Russian Federation
Penza
V. V. Bazylev
Russian Federation
Penza
References
1. Bazylev VV, Voevodin AB, Shalygina AS. Medium-term results of transcatheter implantation of MedLab-CT aortic valve prosthesis. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;(8): 65-69. (In Russ.). DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-65-69.
2. Bazylev VV, Voevodin AB, Zakharova AS, et al. Early clinical and hemodynamic results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the “MedLab-KT” prosthesis. Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery. 2018;22(3): 17-24. (In Russ.). DOI:10.21688/1681-3472-2018-3-17-24.
3. Amat-Santos IJ, Rodes-Cabau J, Urena M, et al. Incidence, predictive factors, and prognostic value of new-onset atrial fibrillation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(2): 178-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.061.
4. Saxena A, Shi WY, Bappayya S, et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation after isolated aortic valve replacement: a cause for concern? Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(1): 133-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.077.
5. Motloch LJ, Reda S, Rottlaender D, et al. Postprocedural atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(1): 124-131. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.078.
6. Letac B, Cribier A, Koning R, et al. Results of percutaneous transluminal valvuloplasty in 218 adults with valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62(9): 598-605.
7. Popylkova OV, Durmanov SS, Bazylev VV, et al. Cardiac conduction disturbances following transapical «MEDLAB-KT» aortic valve implantation: first results. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2019;26(2): 14-18. (In Russ) DOI:10.35336/VF-2019-2-14-18.
8. O’Brien S, Shahian D, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac risk models: part 2 - isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac.Surg. 2009; 88 (1 Suppl.): S23-42. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.056.
9. Nikitina TG, Akishbaya MO, Skopin II, et al. Immediate and lateresults of surgical correction of aortic stenosis. Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2007;49(3): 12-8 (In Russ.).]
10. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(17):1597-1607. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232.
11. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23): 2187-2198. DOI: 10.1056 / NEJMoa1103510.
12. Bagur R, Rodes-Cabau J, Gurvitch R, et al. Need for permanent pacemaker as a complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis and similar baseline electrocardiographic findings. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(5): 540-551. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.004.
13. Nuis RJ, Van Mieghem NM, Schultz CJ, et al. Frequency and causes of stroke during or after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(11):1637-1643. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.389.
14. Roten L, Stortecky S, Scarcia F, et al. Atrioventricular conduction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(10): 1115-1122.DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02354.x.
15. Appel CF, Hultkvist H, Nylander E, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical treatment for aortic stenosis: patient selection and early outcome. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2012;46(5):301-307. DOI: 10.3109/14017431.2012.699636.
16. Nombela-Franco L, Webb JG, de Jaegere PP, et al. Timing, predictive factors, and prognostic value of cerebrovascular events in a large cohort of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circulation. 2012;126(25): 3041-3053. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.110981.
17. Meta-analysis of complications in aortic valve replacement: comparison of Medtronic CoreValve, Edwards Sapien, and surgical aortic valve replacement in 8536 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80(1): 128-138. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23368.
18. Chopard R, Teiger E, Meneveau N, et al. Baseline characteristics and prognostic implications of pre-existing and new-onset atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation results from the FRANCE-2 Registry. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015;8(10) DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.06.010.
19. Banach M, Goch A, Misztal M, et al. Predictors of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134(6): 1569-1576. DOI: 10.1016 / j. jtcvs.2007.08.032.
20. Vavuranakis M, Kolokathis AM, Vrachatis D, et al. Atrial fibrillation during or after TAVI: incidence, implications and therapeutical considerations. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2016;22(13). DOI: 10.2174/1381612822666151208123050.
21. Flaker GC, Belew K, Beckman K, et al. Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation: demographic features and prognostic information from the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Am Heart J. 2005;149(4): 657-663. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.032.
22. Skopin II, Golukhova YeZ, Iskandaryan ShR. Early postoperative predictors of atrial fibrillations after prosthetic repair of the aortic valve. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2005;5: 7-11. (In Russ.).
23. Makarova NV, Durmanov SS, Bazylev VV. Interatrial block: there is an occasion to reflect. Annals of Arrhythmology. 2018;15(2): 112-122 (In Russ.).] DOI: 10.15275/annaritmol.2018.2.6.
24. Rodes-Cabau J, Gutierrez M, Bagur R, et al. Incidence, predictive factors, and prognostic value of myocardial injury following uncomplicated transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(20): 1988-1999. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.060.
25. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998;98: 946-952
26. Naccarelli GV, Varker H, Lin J, et al. Increasing prevalence of atrial brillation and utter in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104: 1534-1539. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.98.10.946.
27. Balluzek MF, Aleksandrova LN. The frequency and characteristics of the course of coronary heart disease associated with the development of atrial fibrillation. Bulletin оf St.-Petersburg University. 2012;2: 3-9. (In Russ.)
28. Manolis AJ, Rosei EA, Coca A. Hypertension and atrial fibrillation: diagnostic approach, prevention and treatment. Position paper of the Working Group ‘Hypertension Arrhythmias and Thrombosis’ of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2012;30(2): 239-52. DOI:10.1097/HJH. 0b013e32834f03bf.
29. Heijman J, Voigt N, Nattel S, Dobrev D. Cellular and molecular electrophysiology of atrial fibrillation initiation, maintenance, and progression. Circulation Research. 2014;114(9): 1483-99. DOI:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302226.
30. Robert R, Porot G, Fichot M, et al. Incidence and predictors of silent AF after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements. 2018;10(1): 67. DOI: 10.1016/j.acvdsp.2017.11.268.
Review
For citations:
Popylkova O.V., Durmanov S.S., Voevodin A.B., Bazylev V.V. Assessment of the frequency and possible risk factors for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the early postoperative period after transapical implantation of the MedLab-CT valve. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2020;27(4):5-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35336/VA-2020-4-5-11