INDICATIONS TO CARDIAC PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION IN A PATIENT WITH TRANSIENT FIRST-DEGREE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK
https://doi.org/10.25760/VA-2019-95-53-56
Abstract
A clinical case report is given of a 69-year-old male patient with fi rst-degree and second-degree (Type I) atrioventricular block complaining of tiredness, increasing fatigue, weakness, and intermissions, in whom implantation of dual-chamber pacemaker led to their almost complete relief.
About the Authors
Yu. V. ShubikRussian Federation
A. E. Rivin
Russian Federation
M. A. Baturova
Russian Federation
V. D. Shurygina
Russian Federation
References
1. Ревишвили А.Ш., Шляхто Е.В., Попов С.В. и др. Российские клинические рекомендации по проведению электрофизиологических исследований, катетерной абляции и применению имплантируемых антиаритмических устройств. Изд. ВНОА, 2017 г. - 701 с.
2. Vardas P.E., Auricchio A., Blanc J.J. et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and сardiac resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. European Heart Journal (2007) 28, 2256-2295.
3. Brignole M., Auricchio A., Baron-Esquivias G. et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). European Heart Journal (2013) 34, 2281-2329.
4. Kusumoto F.M., Schoenfeld M.H., Barrett C. et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay. JACC. PII: S0735-1097(18)38985-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044.
5. Kim Y.H., O’Nunain S., Trouton T. et al. Pseudo-pacemaker syndrome following inadvertent fast pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:178-82.
6. Barold S.S. Indications for permanent cardiac pacing in fi rst-degree AV block: class I, II, or III? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996;19:747-51.
7. Ando G., Versaci F.. Ventriculo-atrial gradient due to fi rst degree atrio-ventricular block: a case report. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5:23.
8. Lader J.M., Park D., Aizer A. et al. Slow pathway modifi cation for treatment of pseudo-pacemaker syndrome due to fi rst-degree atrioventricular block with dual atrioventricular nodal physiology. Heart Rhythm Case Rep. 2018;4:98-101.
9. Carroz P., Delay D., Girod G.. Pseudo-pacemaker syndrome in a young woman with fi rst-degree atrio-ventricular block. Europace. 2010;12:594-6.
10. Fumagalli S., Potpara T.S., Bjerregaard Larsen T. et al. Frailty syndrome: an emerging clinical problem in the everyday management of clinical arrhythmias. The results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace. 2017 Nov 1;19 (11):1896-1902. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux288.
11. Mlynarska A., Mlynarski R., Golba K.S. Anxiety, age, education and activities of daily living as predictive factors of the occurrence of frailty syndrome in patients with heart rhythm disorders. Aging Ment Health. 2018 Sep;22 (9):1179-1183. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1348468. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
12. Школьникова М.А., Шубик Ю.В., Шальнова С.А. и др. Сердечные аритмии у лиц пожилого возраста и их ассоциация с характеристиками здоровья и смертностью. Вестник аритмологии, 2007, Том 49, с. 5-13.
Review
For citations:
Shubik Yu.V., Rivin A.E., Baturova M.A., Shurygina V.D. INDICATIONS TO CARDIAC PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION IN A PATIENT WITH TRANSIENT FIRST-DEGREE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2019;26(1):53-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25760/VA-2019-95-53-56