CARDIAC CONDUCTION DISTURBANCES FOLLOWING TRANSAPICAL «MEDLAB-KT» AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION: FIRST RESULTS
https://doi.org/10.35336/VF-2019-2-14-18
Abstract
Aim: to assess cardiac conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the “MedLab-KT” device in early postoperative period.
Methods. The study comprised 80 patients (mean age 72,4±5,1 years; 42,5% males) undergoing successful TAVR with the “MedLab-KT”. Before operation, all patients were evaluated with 12-lead ECG and 24-hour Holter monitoring, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, coronarography. In 29 (36,3%) patients cardiac conduction abnormalities were detected before operation: 1st degree atrioventricular (AV) block was found in 17 patients, including concomitant left anterior hemiblock (LAH) in 7 patients, and right bundle branch block (RBBB) in 3 (LAH+RBBB). Second degree AV-block type 1 was found in 1 patient. LAH – in 2, RBBB – in 5, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) – in 4. Post-operative follow-up was limited to hospital stay (13,4±7,4 days).
Results. De-novo conduction abnormalities (reversible and irreversible) were detected in 41 patients (51,3%). Post-TAVR complete AV-block was found in 6 (7,5%) patients, and required temporal pacing. In 4 of those patients AV-block was transient and resolved within 1 day. In 2 (2,5%) patients permanent pacing was required due to irreversible distal AV-block. In one case AV-block developed 2 days after TAVR in a patient with pre-existent 1st degree AV-block in combination with LAH+RBBB. Another patient developed complete AV-block at 3d day after TAVR; in this case there was pre-existent 1st degree AV-block plus LAH. Persistent interventricular block was found in 35 patients: complete LBBB - in 17 patients and complete RBBB – in 1 patient. There were no statistically significant predictors of conduction disturbance development following TAVR.
About the Authors
O. V. PopylkovaRussian Federation
S. S. Durmanov
Russian Federation
V. V. Bazylev
Russian Federation
A. B. Voevodin
Russian Federation
References
1. Евдокимов С.В., Базылев В.В., Россейкин Е.В и др. Протез аортального клапана сердца для транскатетерной имплантации; патент на изобретение RUS 2634418 21.06.2016
2. Евдокимов С.В., Базылев В.В., Евдокимов А.С. Шприц для создания давления в баллонном катетере; патент на изобретение RUS 173451 27.01.2017
3. Базылев В.В., Воеводин А.Б., Захарова А.С., Россейкин Е.В. Средне-отдаленные результаты транскатетерной имплантации протеза аортального клапана «МЕДЛАБ-КТ». Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. 2018; 19(6):163.
4. Базылев В.В., Воеводин А.Б., Захарова А.С., Россейкин Е.В. Непосредственные клинические и гемодинамические результаты транскатетерной имплантации протеза аортального клапана «МедЛабКТ». Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2018;22(3):17-24.
5. Sundt T.M., Bailey M.S., Moon M.R. et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years. Circulation. 2000; 102 (19 Suppl. 3): III70-4.
6. Safian R.D., Berman A.D., Diver D.J. et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 170 consecutive patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988; 319 (3): 125-30.
7. Letac B., Cribier A., Koning R., Bellefleur J.P. Results of percutaneous transluminal valvuloplasty in 218 adults with valvular aortic stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 1988; 62 (9): 598-605.
8. Otto C.M., Mickel M.C., Kennedy J.W. et al. Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1994; 89 (2): 642-50.
9. Siontis G., Jüni P., Pilgrim T. et al. Predictors of perma nent pacemaker implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR: a metaanalysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014; 64 (2): 129-40.
10. Базылев В.В., Гальцева Н.В. Физическая реабилитация больных после кардиохирургических вмешательств в отделении реанимации и интенсивной терапии. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. 2017; 18(6):216.
11. Макарова Н.В., Дурманов С.С., Козлов А.В. и др. Влияет ли ранняя активизация пациентов после имплантации электрокардиостимуляторов на частоту послеоперационных осложнений // Вестник аритмологии. 2013; 74: 40-44.
12. Глумсков А.Б., Дурманов С.С., Базылев В.В. Является ли правожелудочковый электрод электрокардиостимулятора независимым фактором риска в развитии трикуспидальной регургитации в раннем послеоперационном периоде? Одноцентровое проспективное исследование. Анналы аритмологии. 2017;14(1):21-28.
13. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:630-4.
14. O’Brien S., Shahian D., Filardo G. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac risk models: part 2 - isolated valve surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009; 88 (1 Suppl.): S23-42.
15. Никитина Т.Г., Акишбая М.О., Скопин И.И., Бокерия Л.А. Непосредственные и отдаленные результаты хирургической коррекции аортального стеноза. Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2007; 49 (3): 12-8. [Nikitina T.G., Akishbaya M.O., Skopin I.I., Bockeria L.A. Immediate and lateresults of surgical correction of aortic stenosis. Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2007; 3: 12-8 (in Russ.).]
16. Gehlot A., Mullany C.J., Ilstrup D. et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged eighty years and older: early and long-term results. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1996; 111 (5): 1026-36.
17. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation. 2002;106:3006-8.
18. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ et al. PARTNER Trial Investigators: Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2187-98.
19. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M et al. PARTNER Trial Investigators: Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597-607.
20. Gilard M, Eltchaninoff H, Iung B et al. Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1705-15.
21. Medtronic CoreValve ® System Demonstrates Positive Clinical Performance at Two Years in “Real World” ADVANCE Study.
22. Iung B., Baron G., Butchart E.G et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur. Heart J. 2003; 24 (13): 1231-43.
23. Lee M., Yeshwant S.C., Chava S., Lustgarten D.L. Mechanisms of heart block after transcatether aortic valve replacement - cardiac anatomy, clinical predictors and mechanical factors that contribute to permanent pacemaker implantation. Arrhytm.Electrophysiol. Rev. 2015; 4 (2): 81-5.
24. Kawashima T, Sato F. Visualising anatomical evidences on atrioventricular conduction system for TAVI. Int J Cardiol. 2014;174:1-6.
25. Holmes D.R. Jr, Mack M.J., Kaul S. et al. 2012 ACCF/ AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012; 59 (13): 1200-54.
Review
For citations:
Popylkova O.V., Durmanov S.S., Bazylev V.V., Voevodin A.B. CARDIAC CONDUCTION DISTURBANCES FOLLOWING TRANSAPICAL «MEDLAB-KT» AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION: FIRST RESULTS. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2019;26(2):14-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35336/VF-2019-2-14-18