Preview

Journal of Arrhythmology

Advanced search

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in real clinical practice in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after interventional treatment

https://doi.org/10.35336/VA-2021-3-21-27

Abstract

Aim. To study the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) after interventional treatment during 36 months of follow-up.

Material and methods. The study included 135 patients (78 men and 58 women) in the age from 31 to 80 years (mean age 61.0 [55; 66]) with persistent AF who underwent catheter treatment. All patients were treated in the arrhythmia department of the Research Institute of Cardiology (Tomsk National Research Medical Center from 01.01.2017 to 31.12.2017.

Results. In patients with persistent AF, the effectiveness of catheter treatment was 60% after 12 months of follow-up (81 patients had no documented AF during this period) and 63.7 % (n=86) - after 24 and 36 months. No fatal outcomes, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke were observed within 12 months after catheter treatment in patients with an effective procedure. During 36 months of follow-up, the incidence of ischemic stroke on the background of receiving anticoagulant therapy and effective catheter treatment of persistent AF was significantly lower than in patients with unsuccessful ablation (1.16% and 10%, respectively), even though not all patients from the first group received prescribed medication.

Conclusion. Successful radiofrequency procedure/cryo-ablation of AF persistent form significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke from 10% to 1.16% and almost eliminated the likelihood of other thromboembolic complications, while the invasive strategy did not increase the risk of large and small bleeding in this group of patients.

About the Authors

O. R. Eshmatov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tomsk, 5 Kooperativniy alley.



R. E. Batalov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tomsk, 5 Kooperativniy alley.



M. A. Dragunova
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tomsk, 5 Kooperativniy alley.



E. A. Archakov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tomsk, 5 Kooperativniy alley.



S. V. Popov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tomsk, 5 Kooperativniy alley.



References

1. Artemenko SN, Romanov AB, Turov AN, et al. Comparison of outcomes of ostial and antral pulmonary vein isolation and ganglionated plexus ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2012;(68): 14-20. (In Russ.).

2. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285(18): 2370-2375. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.18.2370.

3. Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman А, et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. European Heart Journal. 2006;27(8): 949-953. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi825.

4. Naccarelli GV, Varker H, Lin J, et al. Increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the United States. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2009;104(11): 1534- 1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.022.

5. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, et al. Population prevalence, incidence and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisley study. Heart. 2001;86(5): 516-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heart.86.5.516.

6. Protasov ME, Batalov RE, Khlynin MS, et al. Long-term efficacy and health status in patients with atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency endocardial catheter ablation in maze regimen. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2015;(38): 50-57. (In Russ.).

7. Wyse DG. The Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation: a picture and a thousand words. European Heart Journal. 2005;26(22): 2356-2357. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi489.

8. Khlynin MS, Popov SV, Krivolapov SN, et al. Non-invasive topical diagnostics of heart arrhythmias. Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery. 2014;18(4): 96-103. (In Russ.).

9. Protasov ME, Batalov RE, Khlynin MS, et al. The evaluation of the cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation in the long-term after “maze” radiofrequency endocardial catheter ablation procedure. The Siberian Medical Journal. 2015;30(1): 60-66. (In Russ.).

10. Zavadovsky KV, Saushkin VV, Khlynin MS, et al. Radionuclide assessment of cardiac function and dyssynchrony in children with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology: PACE. 2016;39(11): 1213-1224. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12948.

11. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. European Heart Journal. 2021;42(5): 373-498. https://doi. org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.

12. Revishvili AS, Shlyakhto EV, Sulimov VA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation. In. Clinical recommendations for conducting electrophysiological studies, catheter ablation and the use of implantable antiarrhythmic devices (Revishvili AS, Boytsov SA, Davtyan KV, et al.). Moscow 2017: 463-597. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-9500922-0-6.

13. Revishvili AS, Rzaev FG, Sopov OV, et al. Electrophysiological diagnostics and results of interventional treatment of patients with atfoal fibrillation in presence of pulmonary vein collector. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2006;(45): 60-67. (In Russ.).

14. Revishvili AS, Rzaev FG, Baimbetov AK, et al. Electrophysiological assessment of outcomes of radiofrequency re-ablation of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2009;(57): 29-40. (In Russ.).

15. Calkins H, Reynolds MR, Spector P, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2009;2(4): 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.108.824789.

16. Pappone C, Rosanio S, Oreto G, et al. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: A new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000;102(21): 2619-2628. https://doi.org/10.1161/01. cir.102.21.2619.

17. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;365(11): 981-992.

18. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;365(10): 883-891. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638.


Review

For citations:


Eshmatov O.R., Batalov R.E., Dragunova M.A., Archakov E.A., Popov S.V. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in real clinical practice in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after interventional treatment. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2021;28(3):21-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35336/VA-2021-3-21-27

Views: 997


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1561-8641 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7327 (Online)